Historians love to blow holes in people’s stereotypes. There’s a certain fondness in the field for being able to say, “Well, actually . . .,” and follow it up with a different narrative.
Historians also perpetuate a few stereotypes of their own, though few would admit it. They often deconstruct traditional narratives only to replace them with narratives that need a little deconstruction too.
One of those is their take on Christian missionaries who, according to most assessments, were/are cultural imperialists serving the interests of colonial/neocolonial powers. Whether Catholic or Protestant, from the sixteenth century to today, missionaries have allegedly been part of vast programs to assert the West’s political, economic, and/or cultural dominance over the rest of the world.
It’s a lazy trope for a number of reasons, not the least of which is the fact that quite a few Christian missionaries in the last few decades come from non-Western countries.1 The calling that leads someone to leave their homeland to carry the message of God’s kingdom to another country dates back a couple thousand years, has often been initiated by marginalized people, and, if it’s genuine, has always been motivated primarily by spiritual rather than political, economic, or cultural concerns.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to The Gospel of New to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.